On 4/8/2012 11:37 PM, rajeshwari b wrote:
> I tried building wxWidgets 2.8.12 through Msys. That is, through Msys 
> shell, the TDM-GCC was accessed. The log is attached regarding the 
> commands given, configuration, and make.

I have never tried building wxWidgets in MSYS. However, I've heard it is 
supposed to be possible. Your mileage may vary.

> Previously, i could build wxWidgets 2.8.12successfully  through 
> TDM-GCC, which then was not accessible from Msys. Then, tried 
> compiling from TDM-GCC terminal which was again giving error. I didn't 
> save that log.
*snip*
> then, opened the TDM-GCC terminal, removed the wxwidgets2.8.12 and 
> then installed again, i have attached the log (file name: 
> compile_log_tdm-gcc) for that.

This log appears incomplete -- I see no error messages.

If you want to use the TDM64 version of TDM-GCC to build a 32-bit 
version of wxWidgets, you'll probably need to alter "makefile.gcc" 
according to what I noted in my post here: 
<http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,12701.msg86317.html#msg86317>.

Even without having done that, your command for the build is not doing 
what you think. Assigning different values to the same environment 
variable doesn't add to it; it is merely overridden by the most recent 
assignment.  I recommend the commands referenced in the wxWindowQuickRef 
at <http://wiki.codeblocks.org/index.php?title=WxWindowsQuickRef>, with 
a couple of additions for your specific use case:

mingw32-make -f makefile.gcc BUILD=release SHARED=1 MONOLITHIC=0 UNICODE=1 
CFLAGS=-m32 CXXFLAGS=-m32 RCFLAGS="-F pe-i386"


Cheers,
John E. / TDM

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to