Hi Ruben :)
> Did you use the fancy gerrit stuff? Otherwise you will be completely ignored,
> unfortunately.
As a matter of fact i didnt. i wasn't even aware that this was required,
and i will try to do that right now.
> Qt people aren't very receptive of MinGW(-w64) related stuff, as you could
> probably tell by their first reaction.
Yes, but i noticed their effort in the latest Qt SDK installer to provide
a MinGW version. So i thought to myself "if some people make an
effort and help patching, why not also using MinGW (And MinGW-w64
by extension) for Qt IFW too?"... Also, even if their first reaction could
be a bit odd, i think they might be trying to not waste too much time
on users having very "exotic" requests. That's also one reason i
decided to initiate the first move.
As a last reason, i could have stuck to MSVC or MinGW (As MinGW-w64
only interesting point for me being delay-loaded DLLs, but not
working ATM), i still believe a lot in the MinGW-w64 project, and
i think this kind of step would highly promote the whole toolchain
to more people.
Thanks for your suggestion, and have fun!
Pierre.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
