2012/6/28 Corinna Vinschen <[email protected]>: > On Jun 28 19:05, Kai Tietz wrote: >> 2012/6/28 Corinna Vinschen <[email protected]>: >> > Hi, >> > >> > the below patch adds a few definitions to ntdef.h which are defined >> > in winnt.h in mingw32. Here they are guarded with an `#ifndef NT_INCLUDED' >> > since that's defined in any way if ddk/wdm.h is present as well, which >> > also defines these values. >> > >> > >> > Corinna >> >> Patch is ok. > > Thanks, applied. I'm just wondering, since ntdef.h is included by > wdm.h and friends anyway, wouldn't it make sense to define these > values unconditionally and remove them from wdm.h? > > > Corinna
Well, wdm.h is the header those values belong to. Additionally wdm.h is a header of the ddk we get from ROS. So we have to keep it there, too. Kai ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
