On 10/11/12, Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
>
> patch is ok.  Well, I am not opposed to replace WINAPI here in that
> header by NTAPI.  Ozkan, any objections?
>

NTAPI in winternl.h would be suitable, yes. That's OK by me.


> Thanks,
> Kai
>
>
> 2012/10/11 Corinna Vinschen <vinsc...@redhat.com>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the below patch adds a bit of file and file system releated stuff
>> to winternl.h.  This is quite useful functionality and used by a
>> few Cygwin tools I'd like to keep compilable when we switch to mingw64
>> headers.
>>
>> Ok to apply?
>>
>> Btw., most function declarations in winternl.h use the WINAPI
>> decoration.  Since all these functions are ntdll.dll functions, this
>> should actually be NTAPI.  Granted, it's the same thing, but it's
>> the more correct name for the same thing...
>> If you agree, I'd replace WINAPI with NTAPI throughout as well.  Is
>> that ok?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Corinna
>

--
O.S.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to