2012/11/14 Corinna Vinschen <vinsc...@redhat.com>: > Hi, > > just reading the WDK docs, I found that the structures called > FILE_ID_BOTH_DIRECTORY_INFORMATION and FILE_ID_FULL_DIRECTORY_INFORMATION > in winternl.h are actually called FILE_ID_BOTH_DIR_INFORMATION and > FILE_ID_FULL_DIR_INFORMATION. > > That has been fixed for the non-ID variants by allowing both names > (with and without "ECTORY"), but it's missing for the ID variants. > > Along the same lines, the non-typdef'ed name of the structures also uses > the short form in the WDK docs(*), struct _FILE_FULL_DIR_INFORMATION, > not struct _FILE_FULL_DIRECTORY_INFORMATION, etc. > > Shouldn't that be fixed in winternl.h as well? > > > Corinna > > > (*) > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff540289%28v=vs.85%29.aspx > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff540310%28v=vs.85%29.aspx > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff540235%28v=vs.85%29.aspx > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff540303%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
I would vote to fix that in winternl.h header, too. by this we avoid future clashes. Thanks, Kai ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
