On 08/07/2013 01:35 PM, LRN wrote: > What does "might" mean there? Like, you may get a dependency, or you may > not? It doesn't sound like you ALWAYS get a dependency. > Previously you WOULD get the dependency if you had code that required > it, and WOULD NOT get it otherwise. > Now you get it regardless. > Note that in #57120 the reporter explicitly does long long division, so > for him libgcc is mandatory, and it's fine. > For an empty dll - not so much...
Feel free to file a bug for an enhancement. I'm not a MinGW-w64 developer. Arguing with me is like arguing with the wind. :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
