On 09/09/13 14:51, Kai Tietz wrote: > Hmm? I thought I said already all I have to say to this.
Well, you gave reasons that others don't agree with so we kind of expected you to answer to those doubts. > 1) I see no good need to remove non-inline variant from libmingwex.a library. > 2) If something isn't an intrinsic, well, then move the implementation > file out of the intrinsic-folder, but this doesn't mean we don't want > it in libmingwex.a library. > > In general I don't get the reason, value, and the need for removing > those implementation-files? Clean up, smaller lib size and not promoting broken code? Not strong arguments, but better than any to keep them, IMO... But well, let's agree to disagree ;) > I agree on fixing wrong behavior of intrinsic-functions (and their > implementation files), but such changes please sent in separate > patches, so that I can review them stand-alone. > dw, can you please do that? Cheers, Jacek ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041391&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
