2014-05-07 14:11 GMT+02:00 Corinna Vinschen <[email protected]>: > On May 7 00:59, Kai Tietz wrote: >> Yes, magic wording here is that compiler accepts it and ignores it. >> So it means not in headers. > > Sorry, but I don't get this. So per MSDN, x64 and ARM are identical > with respect to __stdcall. > > If so, why is it the right thing to > > #define __stdcall > > for x64, but the same is not right for ARM?!? I fail to see the > difference. > > > Corinna
That's a fair question. The definition of __stdcall for _WIN64 seems to me like a kludge. In general gcc handles the __stdcall by itself. So this define here looks to me wrong. Kai ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity • Requirements for releasing software faster • Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
