Hi dw, 2015-02-11 10:56 GMT+01:00 dw <[email protected]>: > I wasn't completely satisfied with my previous patch for lrotl (which is why > I didn't push to get it committed). The changes for intrin.h and > intrin-impl.h were fine, but I wasn't satisfied with the changes to > stdlib.h. Now that I've had a chance to think about it again, I finally > settled on this (attached). > > It performs pretty much the same as what's in the current file (to avoid > potential breakage) while making at least some attempt to fix the problem > that can occur with old (broken) versions of x86intrin.h. > > My previous post attempted to try to do mappings, but that just leads to > conflicts with other headers and undefined symbols. > > Comments? Suggestions? Or can we finally call this done? > > dw
Hmm, why disallowing to save user's macro-definitions anymore? Anyway one nit I have. I would like to see instead of use of 'long' the macro '__LONG32'. Regards, Kai ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
