2015-10-29 3:54 GMT+01:00 Martell Malone <[email protected]>:

> My second reason is clang.
> I currently have a mingw-w64 toolchain with this stack.
> clang + libc++ + compiler-rt + lld
> this equates to
> gcc + libstdc++ + libgcc + binutils.
>
> If we want a standalone clang stack using lld we should not have to build
> binutils just to have dlltool generate some import libs for us.
> Not only that but we would have to rebuild dlltool for each target
> defeating the purpose of clang and lld being a multi target toolchain out
> of the box.
>
> With clang we only have to rebuild the crt, libc++ and compiler-rt for
> each target.
> The compiler and linker and related tools never have to be rebuilt.
> using binutils unfortunately breaks this lovely model and increases build
> times.
>
>
You have a functional Clang/libc++ toolchain? That's awesome! Are all
patches upstreamed already and how can I make my own?

:)

Ruben
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to