On 05/25/2016 02:27 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hmm, wouldn't it be better to use here #pragma push_macro/pop_macro
> with undefine instead?
>
> Btw, in what context you hit this issue that within C++ _Bool was
> defined already?
>
> Regards,
> Kai
>
> 2016-05-25 13:26 GMT+02:00 Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen <[email protected]>:
>> ---
>> mingw-w64-headers/crt/yvals.h | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/crt/yvals.h b/mingw-w64-headers/crt/yvals.h
>> index 70593c4..98b6921 100644
>> --- a/mingw-w64-headers/crt/yvals.h
>> +++ b/mingw-w64-headers/crt/yvals.h
>> @@ -163,10 +163,12 @@
>> #define _Restrict __restrict__
>>
>> #ifdef __cplusplus
>> +#ifndef _Bool
>> _STD_BEGIN
>> typedef bool _Bool;
>> _STD_END
>> #endif
>> +#endif
>>
>> #define _LONGLONG /* __MINGW_EXTENSION */ __int64
>> #define _ULONGLONG /* __MINGW_EXTENSION */ unsigned __int64
>> --
>> 2.8.1
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
>> bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
>> restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
>> apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
>> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mingw-w64-public mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
> bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
> restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
> apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
> _______________________________________________
> Mingw-w64-public mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
>
Here's the full output:
In file included from /build/libunwind/src/Unwind-EHABI.cpp:20:
In file included from /build/prefix/include/c++/v1/stdlib.h:101:
In file included from
/build/prefix/include/c++/v1/support/win32/locale_win32.h:20:
In file included from
/build/prefix/armv7-w64-mingw32/include/xlocinfo.h:11:
/build/prefix/armv7-w64-mingw32/include/yvals.h:167:14: error:
redeclaration of C++ built-in type 'bool'
typedef bool _Bool;
^
/build/prefix/bin/../lib/clang/3.8.1/include/stdbool.h:36:15: note:
expanded from macro '_Bool'
#define _Bool bool
^
/build/prefix/bin/../lib/clang/3.8.1/include/stdbool.h:37:15: note:
expanded from macro 'bool'
#define bool bool
^
/build/libunwind/src/Unwind-EHABI.cpp:1001:39: warning: unused parameter
'exception_object' [-Wunused-parameter]
__gnu_unwind_frame(_Unwind_Exception *exception_object,
^
1 warning and 1 error generated.
make[2]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/unwind.dir/Unwind-EHABI.cpp.o] Error 1
This happens when building libunwind.
The #pragma way seems to work equaly well, I have no preference as to
which versions is better, so I'll send a new patch and will let you
decide :)
Thanks,
--
Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen
www.beauzee.fr
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
