Thanks, patch looks better IMO. Have you found the culprit defining _Bool?
Regards, Kai 2016-05-26 9:51 GMT+02:00 Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen <[email protected]>: > --- > mingw-w64-headers/crt/yvals.h | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/crt/yvals.h b/mingw-w64-headers/crt/yvals.h > index 70593c4..15130e4 100644 > --- a/mingw-w64-headers/crt/yvals.h > +++ b/mingw-w64-headers/crt/yvals.h > @@ -163,9 +163,12 @@ > #define _Restrict __restrict__ > > #ifdef __cplusplus > +#pragma push_macro("_Bool") > +#undef _Bool > _STD_BEGIN > typedef bool _Bool; > _STD_END > +#pragma pop_macro("_Bool") > #endif > > #define _LONGLONG /* __MINGW_EXTENSION */ __int64 > -- > 2.8.1 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who > bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM > restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the > apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched! > https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j > _______________________________________________ > Mingw-w64-public mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
