mity 2016-07-04 12:43:
> Hello,
Hi,

> for years, I've used mingw-builds ([1], [2]) happily as a default gcc
> toolchain of my choice
> on Windows hosts. However I can see there are no new builds for many
> months although
> there were some gcc releases (6.1, 5.4) in the mean time. That makes
> me wondering about
> its current status.
> 
> [1]:
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchains%20targetting%20Win32/Personal%20Builds/mingw-builds/
> [2]:
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchains%20targetting%20Win64/Personal%20Builds/mingw-builds/
> 
> Is it still maintained or should I migrate to another build line?
Yes, maintained. At the moment I have not enough free time, but I plan 
to build gcc-5.4.

> Generally, I prefer a self-contained single archive package over large
> any "nested OS solutions"
> like cygwin or MSYS2 or some installers with unclear impact on the
> system. So if the mingw-w64
> is dead, which other personal builds are more or less similar to
> mingw-builds and can be expected
> to be supported in a longer term and recommended for such a
> conservative man like me?
> 
> (I only care about C and C++, preferably with win32 exception model,
> but size of the
> package generally is no big concern.)
> 
> Thanks for any enlightenment.
> Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San
Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries
present their vision of the future. This family event has something for
everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today.
http://sdm.link/attshape
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to