On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 9:42 PM, David Wohlferd <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I don't think application/octet-stream is something we would want to
>> enable.  Doesn't that sound like something that would be abused?
>
> I suppose application/octet-stream might be useful if we commonly worked
> with binary files for patches.  But I agree with you, don't do it.
>
> A google search turned up a few other hits:
>
>   * text/x-diff
>   * application/x-patch

text/x-diff is there as of 36 minutes ago.

We have text/x-patch, not application/x-patch.  I don't understand the
difference.  Do you?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to