That’s a kinda sad stance for a compiler support project, don’t you think?
Best, Norbert. Liu Hao <[email protected]> schrieb am Fr., 7. Apr. 2017 um 05:48 Uhr: > On 2017/4/7 8:11, Norbert Pfeiler wrote: > > Wasn’t LH_Mouse’s point that even if the warning is explicitly turned on > it > > wouldn’t be shown to the user? > > > > The situation for unions is different in C and C++: (I don’t think that > > it’s just about constness changes anything) > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11373203 > Nice link. Nevertheless, I don't think most people care about UB unless > UB bites them (that is, unless UB refuses to work silently). XD > > -- > Best regards, > LH_Mouse > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Mingw-w64-public mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
