On 2017/4/10 10:04, Edward Diener wrote:
> Thanks for the link. I am curious though why you could not have supplied
> alternative versions of the mingw-64/gcc threading library rather than
> entirely new builds of mingw-64/gcc ? Did you actually have to modify
> other modules of mingw-64/gcc to get your library to work with it ?
Yes and it is documented here:
https://github.com/lhmouse/mcfgthread/wiki#how-to-integrate-with-gcc

-- 
Best regards,
LH_Mouse


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to