2017-06-02 16:05 GMT+04:00 JonY <[email protected]>: > On 06/02/2017 11:47 AM, bob by wrote: > > Wonder why including <iostream> bloats my exe file so much (extra 900 > KiB, > > with statically linked libraries), even if nothing from there is used. > Why > > cout requires so much code. > > > > It includes static initializer code to initialize all the std::* > members, so you are increasing code size by merely including the header. >
Can I get more info, what exactly it does and why I need it? > > > I downloaded gcc-6.3.0 source code, and found libstdc++-v3\src\c++11 > > folder. I guess the "cout <<" is somewhere in here, but I'm not sure > where > > to look. Here is the full function name that my debugger is looking for: > > > > std::basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> >& std::operator<< > > <std::char_traits<char> >(std::basic_ostream<char, std::char_traits<char> > >> &, char const*) > > > > Can somebody here write a replacement for the standard cout, that will be > > able to print strings and integers, and internally will just redirect to > > puts and itoa? I'm only starting with C++, I'm not sure how to do it. > > I suppose you want to just use printf. > Aint cout is more safe? I will never write a wrong % code, and it's just more compact. Plus it will allow for compile time checks, instead of runtime only like with printf. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
