In that case I will be back with a patch shortly for you to review. It might look ugly because of a large __clang__ ifdef block but should work.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Martin Storsjö <mar...@martin.st> wrote: > On Fri, 18 Aug 2017, Martell Malone wrote: > > David, I also want to remove KEEP (*(.ctors)); which seems to cause a bug >> when linking in conjunction with KEEP (*(SORT_BY_NAME(.ctors.*))) and our >> new mingw-w64 markers. I have details in this email on binutils ml. >> https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-08/msg00078.html >> I have to create a minified test case for this to get approval to remove >> that line. >> >> Martin, I am fine with adding a __clang__ guard around the implementation >> if we want to land it now rather then keeping it out of tree? >> Kai any objections? >> > > That'd be great yeah. Once we can build at least simple C apps without any > out-of-tree patches, it'll be a much lower barrier for entry for a lot of > more people. > > IIRC Kai at least ok'd the patch once last year. > > > // Martin > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Mingw-w64-public mailing list > Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
