On 18.12.2017 21:57, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2017, Jacek Caban wrote:
>
>> We were unable to do that for a long time, because of additional
>> mingw-w64 patches that were committed on top of upstream version. Those
>> patches started implementing winrt features, but were never finished
>> (and were never compatible with midl). I implemented some of those in
>> midl compatible way in upstream Wine, but also never finished. Right now
>> it's enough for simple IDLs like:
>> https://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/blob/HEAD:/include/windows.foundation.idl
>>
>>
>> winrt aside, there are quite a few changes that mingw-w64 version is
>> missing and it's apparently starting to cause problems.
>>
>> That said, I propose to use upstream Wine upstream version and resurrect
>> import script in the tree. Dropped patches (needed for some winrt IDLs)
>> are easy to get from Git (just use a commit prior to this one). We could
>> even create a separated branch for that, if desired.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban <[email protected]>
>
> Sounds good to me - dunno if someone else should give it an ack as
> well or if my +1 is good enough. 

Thanks.

Kai, I was hoping for your opinion. Do you have different plans for widl
in mingw-w64?

Thanks,
Jacek

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to