2018-02-23 10:56 GMT+01:00 Martin Storsjö <[email protected]>: > On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Kai Tietz via Mingw-w64-public wrote: > >> Patch looks fine beside one nit. The behavior above 4294967 seconds >> seems to be pretty unexpected, isn't it? > > > Well since the useconds_t parameter is a typedef for unsigned int, I > wouldn't think that callers expect to be able to sleep that long anyway. So > all possible input values (the values between 0 and UINT32_MAX) should work > just fine when divided by 1000 and passed to Sleep, no? > > // Martin
True, as long as useconds_t is 32 bits wide So patch is ok. Thanks, Kai ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
