在 2018/6/26 19:33, Jacek Caban 写道:
> I did tests with c89 and c99 before submitting the patch (C++ is
> irrelevant, I don't change behaviour there). I'm also able to build
> Firefox with this patch (which in the past revealed a few inline
> problems, so that's a nice test). Is there anything in particular that
> you think we should test?
>
> Thanks,
> Jacek
>
Does compiling and linking the attached two files using the following
command result in multiple definition ?
clang a.c b.c -std=c99
If we were defining `__forceinline` that way and compiling using GCC
this would result in multiple definitions of `ctime_r()`.
--
Best regards,
LH_Mouse
#define _POSIX_THREAD_SAFE_FUNCTIONS 1
#include <time.h>
extern char * ctime_r(const time_t *, char *);
extern int puts(const char *);
int main(void){
char str[26];
time_t now;
time(&now);
ctime_r(&now, str);
puts(str);
}
#define _POSIX_THREAD_SAFE_FUNCTIONS 1
#include <time.h>
extern char * ctime_r(const time_t *, char *);
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
