在 2019/9/16 16:15, Martin Storsjö 写道:
> On x86, mingw's 80 bit long double doesn't match MSVC's 64 bit long double.
> 
> This was done for a number of other functions in
> d8ed328d4656cc467d692e1c5bd2dc7007695ef8, but the nanl function was
> overlooked (in addition to all the complex functions that I've
> omitted in my testing so far).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <[email protected]>
> ---
> 

This patch looks good to me.


[Off topic:
Would you please try building Clang itself with the _FORTIFY_SOURCE
patch? As our CRT doesn't provide `__chk_fail()` and `__*_chk()`
functions I am suffering from undefined references when building GCC. I
have been tampering with GCC configure variables for quite a while but
it keeps failing sooner or later.
- end of Off topic]



-- 
Best regards,
LH_Mouse

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to