On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 11:13 PM Zach Bacon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Because of trademarks, if it has mingw in the name, then it could > constitute as a violation, regardless if it has -w64 in it or not. > Yeah, but that needs to be tested in a court first. Keith has implied that it's "fait accompli", and that's just bullshit. Still ... I guess it pays to be mindful of the possibilities ... Cheers, Rob _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
