On Mon, 7 Jun 2021, Liu Hao wrote:
在 2021-06-05 14:16, Martin Storsjö 写道:
The second implementation, which was under the 'strtold' name, was
lacking (it didn't support e.g. strings like "0x125p-1"), while the
'__mingw_strtold' one seemed correct and complete.
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <mar...@martin.st>
---
mingw-w64-crt/Makefile.am | 6 +-
mingw-w64-crt/gdtoa/strtodnrp.c | 4 +
mingw-w64-crt/gdtoa/strtopx.c | 4 +
mingw-w64-crt/math/cephes_emath.c | 1283 -----------------------------
mingw-w64-crt/math/cephes_emath.h | 719 ----------------
mingw-w64-crt/misc/strtold.c | 398 ---------
6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2403 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 mingw-w64-crt/math/cephes_emath.c
delete mode 100644 mingw-w64-crt/math/cephes_emath.h
delete mode 100644 mingw-w64-crt/misc/strtold.c
All of these patches look good to me.
N.B. Actually I also used to wonder why we have to keep two `strtold()`
implementations. The one by David M. Gay which you left intact is the de
factor standard one, so I prefer it too.
Thanks, pushed both sets now.
// Martin
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
