Yes, I created the IDL file manually. May I ask the reason why `inline` should not be added? Should those be static functions?
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 7:21 PM LIU Hao <[email protected]> wrote: > > 在 2022-02-11 00:34, Biswapriyo Nath 写道: > > From 45882b4586fcc438742bcf63bf49e2b17281120d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Biswapriyo Nath<[email protected]> > > Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 22:02:23 +0530 > > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] headers: Add vsbackup.idl > > > > Signed-off-by: Biswapriyo Nath<[email protected]> > > --- > > mingw-w64-crt/libsrc/vss-uuid.c | 1 + > > mingw-w64-headers/Makefile.am | 1 + > > mingw-w64-headers/include/vsbackup.idl | 496 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 498 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 mingw-w64-headers/include/vsbackup.idl > > > > I couldn't find such an IDL in Windows SDK. I suspect that we need an IDL so > these interfaces can be > used in C as well? If so then probably plain `inline` specifiers shouldn't be > used. > > > > > -- > Best regards, > LIU Hao _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
