On Fri, 1 Apr 2022, LIU Hao wrote:
在 2022-03-30 22:50, Martin Storsjö 写道:
Thanks, that's indeed a very valid concern. Making the name less generic
would certainly be good, but the symbol could still easily end up
autoexported.
Would it be better to have these things in the CRT as they are not C++,
instead of having a selectany symbol in the header?
While these functions don't seem to do anything much C++ specific, they
still aren't within an 'extern "C" { .. }" block, so they do get C++
mangled and all that.
The selectany variable does need to point at _com_raise_error originally,
and that function is very much C++ (as it throws an exception).
So overall, I don't think we can escape that these bits really are C++.
Yes I agree with these. As suggested in the previous message, I still think
`__error_handler` is too generic for its purpose. Would you please change it
to something specific, such as `__mingw_com_error_handler`?
Yes, that sounds very good to me.
// Martin
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
