On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 1:57 AM LIU Hao <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > I am putting this on hold for a while, until I have some time to look into > it. > > I think the different results can also be expressed as: (1/3) ^ 5 produces 3f70db20a88f4695 1 / (3 ^ 5) produces 3f70db20a88f4696
The latter is a far less error prone approach, and therefore yields the result that should be provided for (1 / 3) ^ 5. Cheers, Rob _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
