Op donderdag 28-01-2010 om 11:35 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Paarvai Naai: > Great. Thanks for the update. One thing though...I am unable to > download the binary packages for the above mentioned packages. It > seems that the permissions for those files aren't correct on your web > server.
Some files were having the wrong SELinux context (I moved them from the ~/rpmbuild folder straight to the www folder). I just fixed them so they should work now. > BTW, when I tried to rebuild gcc from source I get errors like the following: > > echo "\"../../gcc/cp/parser.c\", " >> tmp-gtyp.h > FATAL:/usr/libexec/darwinx/as/i386/as: I don't understand 'Q' flag! > > This is strange since I am on F11 and I am using odcctools compiled > from your source RPM. How are you able to compile this src rpm > cleanly? I've never seen that message before and I haven't got a clue what goes wrong there.. > As an aside, your F11 spec file for odcctools has the following: > BuildRequires: /usr/lib/gcc/i586-redhat-linux > > However, the spec file does not use i586-redhat-linux explicitly > anywhere. Instead, it implicitly uses /usr/bin/gcc, but with the -m32 > option. Is the BuildRequires really needed then? For example, I > don't have gcc.i586 installed on Fedora and it looks like there's no > reason I need it -- gcc.x86_64 provides 64-bit and 32-bit compilation. That strange BuildRequires is needed to get a 32bit compiler installed in the buildroot (a 64bit version of the odcctools produces corrupt binaries..perhaps this area has been improved recently). I originally took it from somewhere else (don't know anymore where exactly) and I didn't bother verifying whether the ugly BuildRequires are really necessary. Regards, Erik van Pienbroek _______________________________________________ mingw mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
