Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
> Next to this, various packages have been renamed from 'mingw32-...' to
> 'cross-...'. This is used to indicate that the package in question
> contain binaries for multiple targets. If a package has been renamed
> from 'mingw32-...' to 'cross-...' then the original 'mingw32-...'
> package will be obsoleted by the 'cross-...' one.
While it makes sense to have a single cross-* SRPM, IMHO the binary RPMs
should really be subpackaged into mingw32-*, mingw64-* and eventually
darwinx-*. If I want to build W32 binaries, I don't need W64 stuff and most
definitely not OS X stuff, and the other way round.
Having all cross targets stuffed into the same binary RPMs strikes me as
extremely unhelpful.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
mingw mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
