On 05/25/2011 02:40 PM, Farkas Levente wrote: > what's the mingw- and mingw32 packages?
Check out the example spec file: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW#Example_Specfile Source packages are now named mingw- and binary packages are mingw32-. Jason Tibbitts explains the rationale for the change in the FPC ticket where he first proposed the change: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/83 > do you plan to support rhel-6? > does the current infrastructure use any special feature (like rpm-4.9) > which is not available on el6? The current example spec file works fine on both RHEL 6 and Fedora Rawhide. If you are only targeting rawhide, you can drop the following 3 lines from the spec file, but you don't have to if you want to keep the spec files in RHEL 6 and Rawhide in sync. %global _use_internal_dependency_generator 0 %global __find_requires %{_mingw32_findrequires} %global __find_provides %{_mingw32_findprovides} > i see on > http://svn.openftd.org/viewvc/Fedora%20Cross%20Compiler%20Framework/ > there're both mingw and mingw32 pacakges why? This is Eric's personal test repository and doesn't reflect what's currently in Fedora. > do you plan to add epel-6 support for these packages? Current guidelines work fine for both EPEL and rawhide, but I'm personally not interested in maintaining mingw packages in EPEL; you are of course very welcome to do so. > we need mingw support on rhel-6 so we'd like to create packages for all > gstreamer related packages which can be used on rhel-6. That's great! There's already a mingw-gstreamer review request by a new contributor. I guess you could start by reviewing that: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704635 Target the current guidelines and everything should work fine on RHEL. Current guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW Hope this helps, Kalev _______________________________________________ mingw mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
