Farkas Levente schreef op wo 06-07-2011 om 14:09 [+0200]: > On 07/06/2011 01:57 PM, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: > > After thinking some more about this I decided to drop the > > mingw-filesystem package and rename the -scripts package to -base. So > > now we've got the mingw-filesystem SRPM which produces 3 binary RPMs: > > mingw32-filesystem, mingw64-filesystem and mingw-filesystem-base. > > but why mingw-filesystem-base better then mingw-filesystem??? > that was my original question too.
I chose that name so it will be more clear to users that the mingw-filesystem-base package only contains the base files which are needed for mingw32 and mingw64 support. If all those files were put in a package named mingw-filesystem it may give users the impression that this package contains complete support for both mingw32 and mingw64 environments (which it doesn't). Regards, Erik van Pienbroek _______________________________________________ mingw mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
