On 08/02/2011 11:31 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 08/02/2011 12:07 PM, Farkas Levente wrote: >> On 08/02/2011 09:42 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: >>> I understand it you are working with the mingw-w64 packages that are not >>> yet in Fedora. However, such changes should first go in rawhide and then >>> synced to Erik's mingw-w64 repo; otherwise someone else will have to do >>> the job of keeping them in sync. >> >> for me the mingw32 is not usable since we can't compile a few gstreamer >> plugin. so i only concentrate on mingw-w64 only. > > Yes, I understand and respect your position. However, you should > consider Fedora MinGW packages to be upstream to what's in Erik's > mingw-w64 repo. Please contribute changes back whenever possible, to > make it easier for other people who also work on the same packages. > > Changes flow from Fedora MinGW packages -> Erik's mingw-w64 repo all the > time, and if the packages are properly in sync, it makes life a lot > easier for everybody involved, especially Erik.
another rather important dll wininet.dll is missing. as i wrote in my original mail imho the current solution is not the right owes. my proposal is to add a a file which contains all dll names form wine's fakedlls' dir and add a macro which generate the provides line: Provides: %(sed "s/\(.*\)/mingw32(\1) /g") -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" _______________________________________________ mingw mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
