Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822312 --- Comment #6 from Gregory Maxwell <[email protected]> 2012-05-18 12:40:43 EDT --- If you say so— though this simply isn't the behavior it has on native binaries: [gmaxwell@helmholtz tmp]$ gcc test.c -o test -fstack-protector-all [gmaxwell@helmholtz tmp]$ ldd test linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fffc618e000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00000038ef600000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00000038ef200000) Though yes indeed, it confuses the heck out of libtool which actually was my problem in getting it to produce a static binary— intermediate libraries were introducing the dynamic dependency when -static was only set at the final linking stage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ mingw mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw
