Hi Dmitrii! I believe that this is the correct, simplified answer. What answer did you expect?
Cheers, --Will On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Dmitrii Kosarev <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey, folks > > I'm studying faster-miniKanren and it seems that I found a program where the > result answer seems to be wrong. It is probably related to the occurs check > in the constraints implementation... Can you look, please? > > Happy hacking, > Dmitrii > > (display > (run* (q) > (fresh (x y) > (== q `(,x ,y)) > (=/= x y) > (=/= y x) > ))) > > ; (((_.0 _.1) (=/= ((_.0 _.1))))) > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "minikanren" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/minikanren. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "minikanren" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/minikanren. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
