Buch-Pedersen, Leif wrote: > Ville, Hi Leif,
thanks for the info. > The setup is like this: > > > [Mobile Node] HoA 2001:1890:1109:4001::1000 > | > ---------------------------------- (foreign network) > | > | fe80:0:0:0:20f:f7ff:feb5:2d8 > | > [ROUTER (Cisco 6503)] > | > | > | > ---------------------------------- (home network) > | > [Home Agent] 2001:1890:1109:4001::40 > > No BU's are sent from MN at all (checked with ethereal) and it makes no > difference whether the HA is running or not. Yes naturally, as the MN isn't able to send its initial BU :-) I see there is a Cisco router between the MN and the HA. Could you also send the RA configuration it uses and/or a packet dump containing some of the RAs it is sending. I'm interested in what especially the prefix lifetimes are and is the autoconf flag set? > This setup works when MN is using MIPL-2.0-rc3 + UMIP patch (and > MIPL-2.0.1 on HA) Ok, that helps narrow the problem down a bit. Does it also work without the UMIP patch? > The debug output is below. I see no attempts to send BU's (which I do > when I use MIPL-2.0-rc3) The other interesting thing is that I don't see it getting any CoA either. The MN won't send a BU without a CoA. The daemon is able to receive a RA from the Cisco router, adds the default route and passes the prefix to the kernel, but the kernel is either unable to configure an autoconfigured CoA or the daemon doesn't get a notification from the kernel about the CoA. What does 'ip -6 addr' say a) before you start the mip6d? b) after you start it? Thanks, Ville _______________________________________________ mipl mailing list [email protected] http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mipl
