Hello all,
I have setup a nemo-testbed well, but now I have three questions.

Firstly, I want to ask is it theoretical possible to use the Alternate Care-of 
address option in mobile-ipv6 binding updates for registrations behind a 
IP-nat  router?
The option would carry the IP-Address behind the nat-router because the 
nat-router will change the source address of the binding update.
The standard says that it can used when the Care-of Address cannot be used as 
a "topologicaly correct source address".

Secondly I want to ask what is the task of the "HaServedPrefix" - option in 
the nemo - HA configuration?
I have read the manual but I didn't realy understand what is meaning by:
"if the MRs derive their Home Addresses from  their  Mobile  Network Prefixes, 
in stead of one of the home link prefixes"
In my opinion the MR gets it's home-prefix form a router-advertisment or from 
the config-file.
In my configuration I used the following addresses:
Home-Network Prefix:           2001:0020::/64
Mobile-Network Präfix:          2001:0021::/64
Foreign Network-Prefixes:  2001:0010::/64
                                                    2001:0012::/64         
                                                    2001:0013::/64
HaServedPrefix on HA:        2001:2001:0020::/28
     Is this correct?

And last I have a routing problem in my testbed.
When the MR is at home, I can't ping the MNNs from a foreign network.
The reason is that the MR is only forwarding packages to the Home-Network and 
to the Mobile-Network (in that networks where it is connected to). The MR 
self can ping everything because it has a default route to the HA.
When the MR moves into a foreign network everything works fine.
To make it work when it is in the home-network I must set up manually 
following route on the MR after starting the nemd:
   ip -6 add route from MOBILE_NETWORK via HA dev eth0
and "ip -6 route show" shows amongst others :
   default from 2001:21::/64 via 2001:20::1 dev eth0
When the MR is in a foreign network, the daemon makes itself such from-routes 
via the tunnel-interface.
Is the hand-made route OK? Or is there a mistake in my configuration?

Thank you for help.

Regards
Sebastian

_______________________________________________
mipl mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mipl

Reply via email to