Zarrar,
Did you ever get to resolve this? If so, please share your story.
Aman
zarrar yousaf wrote:
Hello to all Gurus,
Before implementing MIPL2.0 over my Debian systems running kernel
2.6.14, i want to create a simple IPv6 network *(using static
routes)* with two subnets, and each subnet able to ping6 the other
through an IPv6 enabled router.
here is my scenario:
*Scenario:
*
i have three machines (A, R, B; where A= host1, R=Router, B=host2) and
they are connected as follows
A[eth0]--------------------R[eth1]==R[eth2]-------------------B[eth0]
The IP addresses are as follows (configured in /etc/network/interfaces):
A[eth0] = fec0:106:2300::2/64
R[eth1] = fec0:106:2300::1/64
R[eth2] = fec0:106:2700::1/64
B[eth0] = fec0:106:2700::2/64
I have enabled forwarding (/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/forwarding) and
disabled autoconf, accept_ra, accept_redirects on A, B and R.
Then i add static routes as follows:
*AT NODE A:*
ip -6 route add fec0:106:2700::/64 via fec0:106:2300::1
*AT NODE B:*
ip -6 route add fec0:106:2300::/64 via fec0:106:2700::1
*AT ROUTER (R):*
in the router i add the IPv6 address of A and B in /etc/hosts
After this i am still unable to ping, infact i can't even ping the
directly connected router interface.
when i do an ip -6 neigh show on either A or B it shows the message
"<ipaddress of the interface> dev eth0 nud failed"
Please guide.....
thanks in advance
zarrar
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
mipl mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mipl
_______________________________________________
mipl mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mipl