Nguyen, Minh Trung wrote: > Hi everyone! Hi,
> Does anyone know why MIPL tunnels local messages? Say, for example I'm > attached to a foreign AR and my address is configured with its prefix. > Now I want to ping this AR. In ethereal I get the tunneled HoA source > address instead of the CoA. As far as I can remember the draft say that > local messages shouldn't be tunneled (even if the client is in a foreign > net) - I thought it should use the CoA. Did I muddle something up? the default address selection specification (RFC 3484) tells to prefer a HoA over a CoA for source address. The rationale behind this rule is better session continuity in case of movement. HTH, Ville _______________________________________________ mipl mailing list [email protected] http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mipl
