On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 09:28:19AM +0300, Martti Kuparinen wrote: > Sorry to tell you the bad news but it's not fixed yet...
Ok, so let's do this again... > inside:~> host -t soa mobile-ipv6.org > mobile-ipv6.org has SOA record ns.mobile-ipv6.org. anttit.tcs.hut.fi. > 2006080201 > 86400 7200 3600000 172800 > > This looks just fine. What about the IP address(es) for mobile-ipv6.org? > > inside:~> host mobile-ipv6.org > mobile-ipv6.org has address 130.233.215.196 > mobile-ipv6.org has IPv6 address 2001:708:20:1ff::1 > mobile-ipv6.org mail is handled by 20 smtp.hut.fi. > mobile-ipv6.org mail is handled by 10 mobile-ipv6.org. > > Seems to be okay. And the name servers (i.e. the NS records)? > > inside:~> host ns.mobile-ipv6.org > ns.mobile-ipv6.org is an alias for chasey.mobile-ipv6.org. > chasey.mobile-ipv6.org has address 130.233.215.196 > Host ns.mobile-ipv6.org not found: 2(SERVFAIL) > Host ns.mobile-ipv6.org not found: 2(SERVFAIL) > > Eeek! You MUST NOT use CNAME with NS records. Google for the reason, here are > few examples: $ host ns.mobile-ipv6.org ns.mobile-ipv6.org has address 130.233.215.196 I got it the first time you said it.. no need to shout :) > So please change the NS records to be type A (instead of CNAME). I guess you have some old records cached.. latest is 2006080202, you seem to have 01. Antti _______________________________________________ mipl mailing list [email protected] http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mipl
