Hi mathews, Are you enabling ESP encryption in your "Home agent conf" and "Mobile Node conf" files? if so then try to disable it. Probably there is no rule set on your home agent to decrypt the binding update message.
How ever if you want to have the encryption then you will need to set the rules. hope it helps. shariq --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Send mipl mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, > visit > > http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mipl > or, via email, send a message with subject or body > 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it > is more specific > than "Re: Contents of mipl digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: BU error (Madhush Mathews) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:47:11 +0200 > From: "Madhush Mathews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [mipl] BU error > To: <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hello > > I have been unable to resolve my problem to date. > > >From RFC3775, Section 15.4.5: "If a correspondent > node finds that it is > spending more resources on checking bogus Binding > Updates than it is > likely to save by accepting genuine Binding Updates, > then it may > silently discard some or all Binding Updates without > performing any > cryptographic operations." > > I assume that it is for this (or another similar) > reason that the HA > rejects the BU and I get a "status 130" > (insufficient resources) > message. However, I am at a loss about to how to get > around this > problem. > > I would really appreciate any useful suggestions. > > Thank you. > > Regards > Madhush > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Madhush Mathews > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 October 2006 02:06 PM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: BU error > > Hi all > > I have a MIPL test-bed and the IPv6 network seems to > be working fine. My > test-bed configuration is as follows: > > Home subnet prefix- 2001:5c0:8d03:1::/64 > Foreign subnet prefix- 2001:5c0:8d03:2::/64 > Home Agent address- 2001:5c0:8d03:1::1/64 > Mobile Node: Home address- 2001:5c0:8d03:1::99/64, > Care-of address- > 2001:5c0:8d03:2:211:20ff:fe48:246/64 > > When my MN moves to the foreign subnet and sends a > BU to the HA, I get > an error: The HA receives the BU and creates a > tunnel, then seems to > delete it immediately. The Binding Acknowledge > status code 130 is > "insufficient resources" according to the RFC. The > output I get at the > HA is pasted below: > > mipHA:/home/mipha/Desktop/Scripts# mip6d -c > /usr/src/ha.conf > mip6d[6690]: MIPL Mobile IPv6 for Linux v2.0.2 > started (Home Agent) > main: MIPL Mobile IPv6 for Linux started in debug > mode, not detaching > from terminal > conf_show: config_file = /usr/src/ha.conf > conf_show: vt_hostname = localhost > conf_show: vt_service = 7777 > conf_show: mip6_entity = 2 > conf_show: debug_level = 10 > conf_show: PolicyModulePath = [internal] > conf_show: DefaultBindingAclPolicy = 0 > conf_show: NonVolatileBindingCache = disabled > conf_show: KeyMngMobCapability = disabled > conf_show: UseMnHaIPsec = disabled > conf_show: MnMaxHaBindingLife = 262140 > conf_show: MnMaxCnBindingLife = 420 > conf_show: MnRouterProbes = 0 > conf_show: MnRouterProbeTimeout = 0.000000 > conf_show: InitialBindackTimeoutFirstReg = 1.500000 > conf_show: InitialBindackTimeoutReReg = 1.000000 > conf_show: UseCnBuAck = disabled > conf_show: DoRouteOptimizationMN = disabled > conf_show: MnUseAllInterfaces = disabled > conf_show: MnDiscardHaParamProb = disabled > conf_show: SendMobPfxSols = enabled > conf_show: OptimisticHandoff = disabled > conf_show: SendMobPfxAdvs = enabled > conf_show: SendUnsolMobPfxAdvs = enabled > conf_show: MaxMobPfxAdvInterval = 86400 > conf_show: MinMobPfxAdvInterval = 600 > conf_show: HaMaxBindingLife = 262140 > conf_show: DoRouteOptimizationCN = disabled > xfrm_cn_init: Adding policies and states for CN > xfrm_ha_init: Adding policies and states for HA > ha_if_addr_setup: Joined anycast group > 2001:5c0:8d03:1:fdff:ffff:ffff:fffe on iface 5 > mh_bu_parse: Binding Update Received > ndisc_do_dad: Dad success > __tunnel_add: created tunnel ip6tnl1 (8) from > 2001:5c0:8d03:1:0:0:0:1 to > 2001:5c0:8d03:2:211:20ff:fe48:246 user count 1 > __tunnel_del: tunnel ip6tnl1 (8) from > 2001:5c0:8d03:1:0:0:0:1 to > 2001:5c0:8d03:2:211:20ff:fe48:246 user count > decreased to 0 > __tunnel_del: tunnel deleted > mh_send_ba: status 130 > mh_send: sending MH type 6 > from 2001:5c0:8d03:1:0:0:0:1 > to 2001:5c0:8d03:1:0:0:0:99 > mh_send: remote CoA > 2001:5c0:8d03:2:211:20ff:fe48:246 > > > I'm not sure what to make of this or how to resolve > the problem. Can > anyone help? > > Thank you. > > Regards > Madhush > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > mipl mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mipl > > End of mipl Digest, Vol 42, Issue 9 > *********************************** > __________________________________________________________________________________________ Check out the New Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. (http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta) _______________________________________________ mipl mailing list [email protected] http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mipl
