But why can't we send the packet from MN to CN using the same Type 2 routing header.
The HoA in the Type2 hdr can also serve to tell the correspondent what is the "real" (logical) source of the packet and the CN can confirm it also by comparing it with its Binding cache entry (BCE)?
What do you think?
Zarrar
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: mipl Digest, Vol 43, Issue 2
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:00:01 +0200
>
> Send mipl mailing list submissions to
> [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mipl
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of mipl digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Home Address Destination opt. header v.s. Type-2 Routing
> header (zarrar yousaf)
> 2. Re: Home Address Destination opt. header v.s. Type-2
> Routingheader (Alexandre Berge)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:31:25 +0000
> From: zarrar yousaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [mipl] Home Address Destination opt. header v.s. Type-2
> Routing header
> To: Mobile IP <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi : When I read section 6.4 and section 15.9 in RFC 3775 (MIPv6) ,I don't understand why Type-2 Routing header is needed,Could MIPv6 replace Type-2 Routing with Home Address Destination opt.header ?I have not found any explanation by using google yet.Could anybody help me?Thanks a lot.Sincerely yours,
> _________________________________________________________________
> Stay in touch with old friends and meet new ones with Windows Live Spaces
> http://spaces.live.com/signup.aspx
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/pipermail/mipl/attachments/20061106/6c4e337e/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 11:23:43 +0100
> From: "Alexandre Berge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [mipl] Home Address Destination opt. header v.s. Type-2
> Routingheader
> To: "Mobile IP" <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi,
>
> Routing Header Type 2 is used for packets sent TO Mobile Node. We could say that it indicates the "real" destination of the packet.
> Home Address Destination option header is used for packets sent BY Mobile Node. This tells the correspondent what is the "real" (logical) source of the packet.
>
> Hope it can help
>
> Alex
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of zarrar yousaf
> Sent: Mon 11/6/2006 10:31 AM
> To: Mobile IP
> Subject: [mipl] Home Address Destination opt. header v.s. Type-2 Routingheader
>
> Hi : When I read section 6.4 and section 15.9 in RFC 3775 (MIPv6) ,I don't understand why Type-2 Routing header is needed,Could MIPv6 replace Type-2 Routing with Home Address Destination opt.header ?I have not found any explanation by using google yet.Could anybody help me?Thanks a lot.Sincerely yours,
> _________________________________________________________________
> Stay in touch with old friends and meet new ones with Windows Live Spaces
> http://spaces.live.com/signup.aspx
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> mipl mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mipl
>
> End of mipl Digest, Vol 43, Issue 2
> ***********************************
Try the next generation of search with Windows LiveT Search today! Try it!
_______________________________________________ mipl mailing list [email protected] http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mipl
