Hi,

Takenori KATO wrote:
>> Takenori KATO wrote:
>>> MnHomeLink "eth0" {
>>>         HomeAgentAddress 2004:106:2100::2;
>>>         HomeAddress 2004:106:2100::4/64;
>>> }
>>>
>>> MnHomeLink "eth1" {
>>>         HomeAgentAddress 2004:106:2100::2;
>>>         HomeAddress 2004:106:2100::4/64;
>>> }
>> Any reason why you define 2 "MnHomeLink"?
>> If you only plan to have 1 HoA on your node, I believe that 1 MnHomeLink 
>> is enough, even though you use 2 interfaces.
> 
> Because I want to hand over between Wired-LAN and Wireless-LAN.
> eth0 is Wired-LAN and eth1 is Wireless-LAN.
> That's the reason why there are 2 MnHomeLink.

It that case, defining 2 "Interface", and only one "MnHomeLink" is 
enough. This is what I do in the same scenario as you.

Something like that:

Interface "eth0" {
         MnIfPreference 3;
}
Interface "eth1" {
         MnIfPreference 7;
}
MnHomeLink "eth0" {
         HomeAgentAddress 2004:106:2100::2;
         HomeAddress 2004:106:2100::4/64;
}


Regards,

-- 
Romain KUNTZ
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
mipl mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mipl

Reply via email to