Hi,
I also tried without -6 and it doesn't work. Maybe it's a problem with the 
kernel (even if it works with IPv4 ). I tried that command on HA that is also 
router, and has two Ethernet cards, so 2004:106:2300::1 is the address of my AR 
(one Ethernet card) and 204:106:2700::1 is the address of my HA (the other 
Ethernet card).
And I also tried with fec0:106:2300::1 type of address. Still no result.
If you have other ideas, please help.

Best regards,
Titus

----- Original Message ----
From: shariq haseeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: titus balan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 6, 2007 1:09:19 PM
Subject: Re: [mipl] problem with "ip route" - RTNETLINK answers:Invalid argument

hi!

i meant use:
ip route add 2004:106:2300::/64 via 2004:106:2700::1

not
ip -6 route add 2004:106:2300::/64 via
2004:106:2700::1

my mistake :)

shariq
--- titus balan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
> Thanks for your quick answers. I will try your
> suggestions.
> Shariq, do you mean I should insert the command on
> two rows, cause I don't see another difference?
> Thank you.
> 
> Best regards,
> Titus
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: shariq haseeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Sent: Sunday, May 6, 2007 12:18:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [mipl] problem with "ip route" -
> RTNETLINK answers:Invalid argument
> 
> Hi Titus,
> 
> Use the following command :ip route add
> 2004:106:2300::/64 via 2004:106:2700::1
> 
> DONT use :
> 
> ip route add 2004:106:2300::/64 via 2004:106:2700::1
> 
> rgds,
> Shariq
> 
> --- Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > titus balan wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I am having a  problem with setting an IPv6
> static
> > route.
> > > When I write:  ip -6 route add
> 2004:106:2300::/64
> > via 2004:106:2700::1 or
> > >                       ip -6 route add
> > 2004:106:2300::1/64 via
> > > 2004:106:2700::1
> > 
> > Nothing from 2004::/16 has been allocated yet and
> > afaik that address
> > space is still reserved by IANA. As such you
> should
> > not use that address
> > space.
> > 
> > If you want to use a block of space for testing
> then
> > either use ULA's
> > (RFC4193) or 2001:db8::/32 which is the IPv6
> > Documentation Prefix.
> > 
> > 
> > Of course that doesn't explain your error. But
> that
> > most likely has to
> > do with the fact that you don't have a direct
> route
> > to 2004:106:2700::1
> > yet. Check 'ip -6 ro sho' and 'ip -6 nei sho' for
> > that one.
> > 
> > Greets,
> >  Jeroen
> > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > mipl mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
>
http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mipl
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Need Mail bonding?
> Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo!
> Answers users.
>
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mipl mailing list
> [email protected]
>
http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mipl
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com >
_______________________________________________
> mipl mailing list
> [email protected]
>
http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mipl


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 







 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for earth-friendly autos? 
Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.
http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
_______________________________________________
mipl mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mobile-ipv6.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mipl

Reply via email to