Hi,

instead of sending this to me I’d love to have such discussions
in public, on the miros-mksh@ list – if you give your Okay, I’ll
bounce those mails there and will follow up in public.


Jens Staal dixit:

> Naturally curious as I am, I started to play with trying to compile mksh with
> openwatcom on Linux (Arch x86_64) - mostly due to nostalgia with all the 
> Dos4GW

Oh, Watcom now exists for Linux? Do you have any further information
on that (does it come with source; is it even Open Source; does it
exist in Debian, is it portable to MirBSD, what (CPU) architectures
are supported)?

> It seems like the tests choke on a number of places (preprocessor does not
> successfully identify watcom etc...).

Feel free to suggest fixes for that ;-)

> and the libc bundled with openwatcom does
> not contain some headers that seems to be needed.

mksh does need a somewhat Unix environment. If you can share what
headers are missing… as long as the functionality is there, I can
make them optional and/or include/check for different headers.

fork() is an absolute requirement however, so a DOS-like environment
including djgpp (I tried! But bash.exe segfaulted trying to run
Build.sh…) is not enough.

> Are there any tricks to get through the Build.sh?

Depends mostly on the place. Header checks are easy, others, not so.

> Or is the watcom support abandoned?

There’s none… it was, according to the changelog, submitted by RT
from IRC, but only “begun”. I do not currently have access to it
myself, either.

> There seems to be a lot of warnings during the tests...

That’s normal for “failing” tests (although I try to keep them to
a reasonable level still) and a minor bug for “succeeding” ones.


I suggest you speak to RT on IRC and/or try to get me a Watcom ☺

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
17:08⎜«Vutral» früher gabs keine packenden smartphones und so
17:08⎜«Vutral» heute gibts frauen die sind facebooksüchtig
17:10⎜«Vutral» aber auch traurig; früher warst du als nerd voll am arsch
17:10⎜«Vutral» heute bist du als nerd der einzige der wirklich damit klarkommt

Reply via email to