On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 18:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi everyone, > > get it while it’s hot! https://www.mirbsd.org/mksh.htm#r47 says why. > Segfaulting and other un-nice things got fixed. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922974 (a GCC bug) > currently prevents me from updating the Debian source package, > at least unless I disable LTO like the Feodora packager did. > (Oh, and that klibc is not updated yet. But I could NMU that.) > > I did update MirPorts, FreeWRT and the OpenSuSE Buildservice. > > > And don’t forget to have read the mksh/Win32 first public beta > announcement > https://www.mirbsd.org/permalinks/wlog-10_e20130718-tg.htm either! > > bye, > //mirabilos Thanks I have not looked at it yet - did the "build-on-plan9" modifications get included? I also saw that Plan9 was in the "needs packaging" group on the same page. I have uploaded an archive that is intended to be extracted in / on Plan9 on two places: https://ports2plan9.googlecode.com/files/mksh-R46.tbz http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sources/contrib/staal1978/pkg/mksh-R46.tbz they are built with -DMKSH_NOPROSPECTOFWORK but otherwise the vanilla modified Build.sh and using the ansi/posix "cc" front end of the native plan9 compilers. The reason I ask is because when it in principle builds out-of-the box (although broken if not -DMKSH_NOPROSPECTOFWORK) it might be time to ask on 9fans for some help tracking down/fixing the blocking bug in the APE libraries (I could link to your previous email with the speculation on possible "miscreants").
