On Saturday 16 May 2015 21:44:20 you wrote: > Jens Staal dixit: > >https://bitbucket.org/mveety/9front-ports/issue/13/shells-mksh-doesnt-build > >-on-9front > The bugreport is unusable, it lacks the version.
It is indeed R50f. The last time I tried to build it on (386) Plan9 was R47 so I was happy to see that no build breakage had happened. > > But assuming the current version, this matches two static > assertions. What are the sizes of size_t and pointers to > data and functions, respectively, on Plan 9 on amd64? > I remember that something like this was what we had to tweak back in the days to get it to build on 386 with native compilers. I don't have an amd64 VM image (yet) so I can not run a test myself. I will ask on the isuse tracker. > (Can I comment on the bugreport with eMail? If so, let’s Cc it.) > Unfortunately, it does not seem like each issue discussion gets its unique e- mail adress. Because of this, I am CCing the original reporter who might have more intimate knowledge of the issue. > bye, > //mirabilos
