For a site like ours, runnning hunderds of different mirrors, allowing for different approach for each one would be very difficult and time consuming. Therefore, we would prefer to stick to the current mirror.pl script. We are considering to migrate to Lee's new mirror in java, once it's proven stable, but not soon probably.
I'd suggest sticking to the current solution, unless there is something wrong with it. --w > > > Now that apache.org is a FreeBSD box, we are beginning to explore using a > program called "cvsup". Its basis is a program called "sup", which > essentially works as a remote-file-synchronization program; it allows a > site to maintain a mirror of a remote file tree in a very efficient manner. > "cvsup" is an extension of this to use a CVS tree (when it exists) to > allow for "diffs" to be sent when a file changes, rather than resending the > whole file. Thus, all in all it would be a more bandwidth-efficient method > of updating one of your mirror sites from the source. > > Is this a program you're familiar with? Would you consider using it? More > importantly, if anonymous FTP were to be discontinued (except for the > programs in /dist of course) would any of you *not* be able to use cvsup? > > Binaries for other platforms, as well as more information, can be found at > > ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/CVSup/ > > Brian > > > --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- > "it's a big world, with lots of records to play."-sig [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
