On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 02:05:24PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote: > Urm, ouch. I have to claim responsibility for that one. I knew the > mirrors would have to resync but I didn't think it was that big (and > didn't bother to count MB's). :-(
This isn't your fault, it's the fault of the way we organize our files and directories. The fact that we ever move files around after they become "old" means that we are doubling the amount of sync bandwidth over time. We eat this all at once (like last night) or slowly, but it still eats unnecessary bandwidth. Regardless, let's kill 6 (+/- 2) birds with one stone and fix it all at once. :) Besides, coming up with a consistent scheme makes it easier for everyone, and if we can solve daedalus' bandwidth problems at the same time let's do it. -aaron
