On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Joshua Slive wrote: > OK. That's perfectly valid, and is the reason we make those available via > rsync. Just wanted to make sure you know what you are doing.
i think i do, but it certainly doesn't hurt to get a second opinion (such as from yourself :-) as things evolve and what originally made sense might not anymore.. any chance of getting an update on how the mirroring side of apache is going in the interim - and what the "plan" is for the direction we're moving ? from the feedback we get, our apache mirror users want to see: o a replicated "apache.org" site which lets them browse things like documentation o local downloads of apache source/binaries - the ability to "stay within" a mirror once you have picked it. one of the things that annoyed them was when they went to our mirror and found themselves following a link that went back to apache.org and then it never linked back. we've tried to address that but it's more of a structural issue than anything we do with rewrites.. regards, -jason
