Hi, Am 06.12.2010 um 06:00 schrieb Rainer Bielefeld: > "Dr. Peter Pöml" schrieb: > >> That particular mirror can be a false negative. There is a known >> network issue impeding us updating our reflection of that mirror's >> content -- but I have no time to debug it right now. So we not >> necessarily redirect to this mirror, for newly published files. But >> the mirror pulls files regularly. When you checked, the RC1 files >> were not published yet, though. So this mirror could not have the >> files. > > Hi, > > Might have been an accident, today TU-BS is "up to day". I will watch that.
No, not an accident. There are two sors of mirrors. Ones that we distribute content "in private" to, to "prime" the mirror system, and ones that simply sync periodically from what we offer publicly. See http://download.documentfoundation.org/mirroring.html for more details about this distinction. TU-BS just gets the files that are already public, so there was no way it could have the files at the time you checked. (Except by syncing from a mirror that got it from the stage area, instead of syncing from us - because we forgot to make the new directory private this time.) In addition, there is the little network/scan problem between us and this particular mirror at this time, which can further get in the way. >> Please refrain from creating static, manually maintained lists of >> mirrors -- we can easily create them automatically, > > Yes, of course, the automatically created list is great. But may be we want > to talk to some mirror administrators to list LibreOffice additionally? for > that such a manual check (may be without completing the started WIKI list) > can be useful. Sorry, what do you mean by this? Care to explain? Peter -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/mirrors/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
